At a recent Toastmasters Appreciation Brunch, guest speaker Eric Solowka delivered a keynote presentation on leadership. Part of his point of view is the concept that leadership is challenging and requires courage to help change the status quo. By standing up and challenging the status quo, of course, we become targets for those in favour of keeping things the way they are.
When I consider political leaders, the evidence mounts; from Winston Churchill, to Pierre Elliot Trudeau, to Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher, to Rob Ford. And consider business leaders. We just have to look to Hewlett-Packard to see how recent CEOs have caused disruption amongst not just the investor community, but also their employees: Carleton S. (Carly) Fiorina, Mark V.Hurd, Léo Apotheker, to recently appointed Meg Whitman.
I mused about this “leader as a target” at a microscopic level – namely, how as it relates to the workforce. How much does our perception play in how we react to others? Consider the “leaders in the making” whom we encounter on a daily basis.
Consider a new employee with a new idea of how things are done is potentially challenged and negated by those used to the “way things are always done.” Interestingly enough, the new person might not even be aware of what the general consensus is or how a suggestion might impact how she is perceived amongst her new colleagues.
Does this make her a “leader”? Is she intentionally a change agent? Do we dislike/distrust her methods because we fear for our jobs? Even if her suggestions warrant consideration, why do we resist them vehemently?
Publicly, we applaud “leaders” yet privately we seem to shun them. Preferring the stability of being a “team player” and yet, leaders have the courage to change practices and incite innovation and growth to organizations.
Being a leader in this context certainly takes courage.